Gwazdavskas v. Tharp et al
| Paul Ronald Gwazdavskas |
| Co Schienschang 34, Brandon Tharp, F Dyer III and Judge Dale B. Durrer |
| 7:2019cv00426 |
| June 10, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Virginia |
| Robert S Ballou |
| Elizabeth K Dillon |
| Joel C Hoppe |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 16, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 14 Pursuant to STANDING ORDER 2019-5, the U.S. Magistrate Judge Joel C. Hoppe is referred to this case. Magistrate Judge Robert S. Ballou no longer assigned to the case. Motions referred to Joel C. Hoppe. (slt) |
Filing 13
Order entered Conditionally Filing this action pursuant to 42 USC Section 1983; Regarding Consent to Fee; Deferring all action in this case; Advising inmate to comply within the allotted time and to notify of changes in address or risk dismissal Responses due by 8/9/2019. Signed by Magistrate Judge Robert S. Ballou on 7/17/2019. (slt)
|
| Filing 12 Letter from Clerk's Office regarding cases. (slt) |
| Filing 11 MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order by Paul Ronald Gwazdavskas. (slt) |
| Filing 10 Prisoner Trust Account Report by Paul Ronald Gwazdavskas (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(slt) |
|
Filing 9
ORDER: It is hereby ORDERED that Gwazdavskas' motion (Dkt. No. #6 ) to hold the Superintendent of Central Virginia Regional Jail in contempt for failing to provide Gwazdavskas with requested financial documents to support his in forma pauperis application is DENIED. However, the court will grant Gwazdavskas an extension of twenty-one (21) days for him to comply with the court's conditional filing order (Dkt. No. #5 ) by either submitting the required documentation or submitting sufficient documentation, including an affidavit, to demonstrate that he has unsuccessfully attempted to acquire the documentation. Entered by Magistrate Judge Robert S. Ballou on 7/8/2019. (slt)
|
| Filing 8 FINANCIAL AFFIDAVIT by Paul Ronald Gwazdavskas (slt) |
| Filing 7 Statement of Assets by Paul Ronald Gwazdavskas (slt) |
| Filing 6 Motion for Contempt of Court re: Conditionally Filed Order #5 by Paul Ronald Gwazdavskas. Motions referred to Judge Robert S. Ballou. (slt) |
|
Filing 5
Order entered Conditionally Filing this action pursuant to 42 USC Section 1983; Regarding Prisoner Trust Account;Statement of Assets; Advising inmate as to 3 strikes rule of PLRA; Assessing a filing fee; Deferring all action in this case; Advising inmate to comply within the allotted time and to notify of changes in address or risk dismissal Responses due by 7/3/2019. Signed by Magistrate Judge Robert S. Ballou on 6/10/2019. (slt)
|
| Filing 4 Case transferred in from District of Virginia Eastern; Case Number 1:19-cv-00742. Original file certified copy of transfer order and docket sheet received. |
|
Filing 3
ORDER transferring plaintiff's complaint to the Western District of Virginia. Signed by District Judge Leonie M. Brinkema on 6/7/2019. (aott,c/m/s 6/7/2019 ) [Transferred from Virginia Eastern on 6/10/2019.]
|
| Filing 2 Acknowledgment of Receipt. (choy, c/m 06/07/2019) [Transferred from Virginia Eastern on 6/10/2019.] |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against F Dyer III, Co Schienschang 34, Brandon Tharp, filed by Paul Ronald Gwazdavskas. (Attachments: #1 Prisoner Database, #2 Letter to Court)(choy, ) [Transferred from Virginia Eastern on 6/10/2019.] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
