Mattingley v. Sheriff et al
Plaintiff: Robert Scott Mattingley
Defendant: Medical Doctor and Sheriff
Case Number: 7:2019cv00638
Filed: September 23, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Virginia
Presiding Judge: James P Jones
Referring Judge: Pamela Meade Sargent
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 7, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 15, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 11 MINUTE ORDER granting #10 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply Response ordered by Docket Item No. 9 due by 11/29/2019. Signed by Magistrate Judge Pamela Meade Sargent on 11/15/19. (PMS)
November 14, 2019 Filing 10 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #9 Order to Respond - Prisoner by Robert Scott Mattingley. Motions referred to Judge Pamela Meade Sargent. (slt)
October 17, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 9 Order for Plaintiff to Respond with Six-month statements (Mar.-Aug.) within 20 days Responses due by 11/12/2019. Signed by Magistrate Judge Pamela Meade Sargent on 10/17/2019. (slt)
October 17, 2019 Filing 8 NOTICE of Change of Address by Robert Scott Mattingley-Updated address:FMC-Devens, P.O. Box 879, Ayer, MA 01432 (slt)
October 17, 2019 Filing 7 Prisoner Trust Account Report (Incomplete) by Robert Scott Mattingley (slt)
September 24, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER denying #4 Motion to Appoint Counsel. Signed by Magistrate Judge Pamela Meade Sargent on 9/24/2019. (slt)
September 24, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 5 Order entered Conditionally Filing this action pursuant to 42 USC Section 1983; Regarding Prisoner Trust Account; Advising inmate as to 3 strikes rule of PLRA; Assessing a filing fee; Deferring all action in this case; Advising inmate to comply within the allotted time and to notify of changes in address or risk dismissal Responses due by 10/17/2019. Signed by Magistrate Judge Pamela Meade Sargent on 9/24/2019. (slt)
September 23, 2019 Filing 4 MOTION to Appoint Counsel by Robert Scott Mattingley. Motions referred to Judge Pamela Meade Sargent. (ck)
September 23, 2019 Filing 3 Statement of Assets by Robert Scott Mattingley (ck)
September 23, 2019 Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Robert Scott Mattingley. Motions referred to Judge Pamela Meade Sargent. (ck)
September 23, 2019 Filing 1 COMPLAINT pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1983 against Medical Doctor, Sheriff, filed by Robert Scott Mattingley. (Attachments: #1 Cover Letter, #2 Change of Address Form (address is the same))(ck)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Virginia Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Mattingley v. Sheriff et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Medical Doctor
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Sheriff
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Robert Scott Mattingley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?