Mullins v. Clear et al
Eugene McAuthur Mullins |
Stephen Clear, Defendants 1,2,3 and Howard Carlton |
7:2020cv00573 |
September 23, 2020 |
US District Court for the Western District of Virginia |
Robert S Ballou |
Thomas T Cullen |
Joel C Hoppe |
Michael F Urbanski |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. § 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 29, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 15 Mail Returned as Undeliverable: re #8 Request for Waiver of Service, regarding Defendants 1,2,3; (No forwarding address given) (aab) |
Filing 14 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Stephen Clear. Stephen Clear waiver sent on 10/21/2020, answer due 12/21/2020.(Schnetzler, Nathan) |
Filing 13 NOTICE of Appearance by Nathan Henry Schnetzler on behalf of Stephen Clear (Schnetzler, Nathan) |
Filing 12 NOTICE of Appearance by Taylor Denslow Brewer on behalf of Howard Carlton (Brewer, Taylor) |
Filing 11 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Howard Carlton. Howard Carlton waiver sent on 10/21/2020, answer due 12/21/2020.(Brewer, Taylor) (Main Document 11 replaced on 11/16/2020) (aab). Modified on 11/16/2020 (aab).Replaced deficient pdf document with flattened pdf document |
Filing 10 Mail Returned as Undeliverable: re #7 Order Prisoner Service - (1983 or Bivens), regarding Eugene Mullins; (It was resent at docket entry #9) (tvt) |
Filing 9 NOTICE of Change of Address by Eugene McAuthur Mullins; SWVRJ-Duffield, P.O. Box 367, Duffield, Virginia 24244. Clerk mailing document #7 to Plaintiff at updated address. (aab) |
Filing 8 REQUEST FOR WAIVER of Service sent to Stephen Clear, Howard Carlton, Defendants 1, 2, 3 on 10/21/2020. (Service paperwork mailed to Defendant(s) at Following address: SWVRJA-Abingdon, P.O. Box 280. Meadowview, VA 24361.) Waiver of Service due by 11/20/2020. (Attachments: #1 Notice and waiver sent to Carlton, #2 Notice and waiver sent to Defendants 1, 2, 3)(slt) |
Filing 7 Order entered Directing the Clerk to attempt service of process upon the named defendants Defendants 1,2,3, Howard Carlton, Stephen Clear re #1 Complaint filed by Eugene McAuthur Mullins. Signed by Magistrate Judge Robert S. Ballou on 10/21/2020. (Order mailed to Pro Se Party via US Mail)(slt) |
Filing 6 Consent to Fee by Plaintiff Eugene McAuthur Mullins (aab) |
Filing 5 Pursuant to STANDING ORDER 2020-16, the U.S. Magistrate Judge Robert S. Ballou is referred to this case. Magistrate Judge Joel C. Hoppe no longer assigned to the case. (tvt) |
Filing 4 ORDER TRANSFERRING CASE. Case transferred to Judge Thomas T. Cullen for all further proceedings. Chief Judge Michael F. Urbanski no longer assigned to case. Signed by Chief Judge Michael F. Urbanski on 9/30/2020. (Order mailed to Pro Se Party via US Mail)(tvt) |
Filing 3 Order entered Conditionally Filing this action pursuant to 42 USC Section 1983; Regarding Consent to Fee; Advising inmate as to 3 strikes rule of PLRA; Assessing a filing fee; Deferring all action in this case; Advising inmate to comply within the allotted time and to notify of changes in address or risk dismissal within 20 days Responses due by 10/19/2020. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joel C. Hoppe on 9/24/2020. (Order mailed to Pro Se Party via US Mail)(slt) |
Filing 2 Prisoner Trust Account Report and Statement of Assets by Eugene McAuthur Mullins (Attachments: #1 Statement of Assets)(ck) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1983 against Defendants 1,2,3, Howard Carlton, Stephen Clear, filed by Eugene McAuthur Mullins.(ck) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.