Farnsworth v. Yellen
| Leo Brandon Farnsworth |
| Janet Yellen |
| 7:2021cv00623 |
| December 10, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Virginia |
| Joel C Hoppe |
| Michael F Urbanski |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2671 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 3, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 10
Consent to Fee by Plaintiff Leo Brandon Farnsworth (aab)
|
|
Filing 9
Prisoner Trust Account Report by Leo Brandon Farnsworth (aab)
|
|
Filing 8
Order entered Conditionally Filing this action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2671 Federal Tort claim ; Regarding Consent to Fee; Assessing a filing fee; Deferring all action in this case; Advising inmate to comply within the allotted time and to notify of changes in address or risk dismissal within 20 days. Responses due by 2/7/2022. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joel C. Hoppe on 1/13/2022. (Order mailed to Pro Se Party via US Mail)(aab)
|
|
Filing 7
Prisoner Trust Account Report by Leo Brandon Farnsworth (aab)
|
|
6 Order on Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply, mailed to Pro Se Party via US Mail (aab)
|
|
Filing 6
ORAL ORDER granting #5 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply. Plaintiff is granted an extension of 15 days to comply with the Order entered on December 13, 2021, ECF No. 3. Entered by Magistrate Judge Joel C. Hoppe on 1/3/22. This Notice of Electronic Filing is the Official ORDER for this entry. No document is attached. (Order mailed to Pro Se Party via US Mail)(JCH)
|
|
Filing 5
MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #3 Order Prisoner Conditionally Filed, by Leo Brandon Farnsworth. Motions referred to Judge Joel C. Hoppe. (aab) (Additional attachment(s) added on 12/30/2021: #1 Cover Letter) (aab).
|
|
Filing 4
Statement of Assets by Leo Brandon Farnsworth (aab)
|
|
Filing 3
Order entered Conditionally Filing this action; Regarding Prisoner Trust Account; Statement of Assets; Deferring all action in this case; Advising inmate to comply within the allotted time and to notify of changes in address or risk dismissal within 20 days Responses due by 1/5/2022. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joel C. Hoppe on 12/13/2021. (Order mailed to Pro Se Party via US Mail)(tvt)
|
|
Filing 2
MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Leo Brandon Farnsworth. Motions referred to Judge Joel C. Hoppe. (aab)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2671 Federal Tort claim against Janet Yellen, filed by Leo Brandon Farnsworth. (Attachments: #1 Cover Letter)(aab)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Farnsworth v. Yellen | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Leo Brandon Farnsworth | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Janet Yellen | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
