Snead v. United States of America Armed Forces et al
| King Cedric Omar Snead |
| United States of America Armed Forces, Commander & Cheif and Congress |
| 7:2023cv00503 |
| August 8, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Virginia |
| Roanoke Office |
| James P Jones |
| Pamela Meade Sargent |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 11, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
FINAL ORDER granting plaintiff to proceed in forma pauperis in this case only. This action is summarily DISMISSED, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2)(B), as frivolous; and the clerk will CLOSE the case. Signed by Senior Judge James P. Jones on 8/11/2023. (Order mailed to Pro Se Party via US Mail)(aab)
|
|
Filing 4
OPINION. Signed by Senior Judge James P. Jones on 8/11/2023. (Opinion mailed to Pro Se Party via US Mail)(aab)
|
|
Filing 3
Prisoner Trust Account Report (Incomplete) and Statement of Assets by King Cedric Omar Snead (tvt)
|
|
Filing 2
MOTION to Appoint Counsel by King Cedric Omar Snead. Motions referred to Judge Pamela Meade Sargent. (tvt)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1983 against Commander & Chief, Congress, United States of America Armed Forces, filed by King Cedric Omar Snead.(tvt)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
