EQT Corporation v. Miller

EQT Corporation v. Miller

Plaintiff:	EQT Corporation
Defendant:	Brenda A. Miller
Case Number:	1:2011cv00197
Filed:	December 13, 2011
Court:	US District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia
Office:	Clarksburg Office
County:	Harrison
Presiding Judge:	Frederick P. Stamp
Nature of Suit:	Other Contract
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
May 14, 2013	Filing 42 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER OVERRULING DEFENDANTS OBJECTIONS TO PLAINTIFF'S BILL OF COSTS AND AWARDING PLAINTIFF COSTS AS SOUGHT. Overruling 40 Objections to Bill of Costs. The plaintiff is hereby awarded all costs requested in its b ill of costs 38 , less the voluntarily withdrawn $9.13 for postage and mailing, in the total amount of $936.20. The Clerk is DIRECTED to enter an amended judgment order in this civil action which reflects this award. Signed by Senior Judge Frederick P. Stamp, Jr. on 5/14/2013. (kd)
September 5, 2012	Filing 36 MEMORANDUM AND OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFF'S 10 MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS AND DENYING 12 DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO STRIKE PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS OR, IN THE ALTER NATIVE, CROSS-MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS. It is further ORDERED that this civil action be DISMISSED and STRICKEN from the active docket of this Court. The Clerk is DIRECTED to enter judgment on this matter. Signed by Senior Judge Frederick P. Stamp, Jr. on 9/5/2012. (kd)

Date Filed

Document Text

May 14, 2013

Filing 42 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER OVERRULING DEFENDANTS OBJECTIONS TO PLAINTIFF'S BILL OF COSTS AND AWARDING PLAINTIFF COSTS AS SOUGHT. Overruling 40 Objections to Bill of Costs. The plaintiff is hereby awarded all costs requested in its b ill of costs 38 , less the voluntarily withdrawn $9.13 for postage and mailing, in the total amount of $936.20. The Clerk is DIRECTED to enter an amended judgment order in this civil action which reflects this award. Signed by Senior Judge Frederick P. Stamp, Jr. on 5/14/2013. (kd)

September 5, 2012

Filing 36 MEMORANDUM AND OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFF'S 10 MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS AND DENYING 12 DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO STRIKE PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS OR, IN THE ALTER NATIVE, CROSS-MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS. It is further ORDERED that this civil action be DISMISSED and STRICKEN from the active docket of this Court. The Clerk is DIRECTED to enter judgment on this matter. Signed by Senior Judge Frederick P. Stamp, Jr. on 9/5/2012. (kd)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the West Virginia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: EQT Corporation v. Miller
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: EQT Corporation
Represented By:	Kevin L. Carr
Represented By:	Lewis Gordon Brewer
Represented By:	Jennifer S. Greenlief
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Brenda A. Miller
Represented By:	Maria Hughes
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?