Scales v. Phillips

Scales v. Phillips

Petitioner:	Sydney Scales
Respondent:	Wayne A. Phillips
Case Number:	2:2008cv00072
Filed:	June 24, 2008
Court:	US District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia
Office:	Habeas Corpus (General) Office
County:	Monongalia
Presiding Judge:	John S. Kaull
Presiding Judge:	Robert E. Maxwell
Nature of Suit:	None
Cause of Action:	Federal Question
Jury Demanded By:	28:2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
January 23, 2009	Filing 26 ORDER denying Respondent's 6 Motion to Dismiss; denying Petitioner's 18 Motion for Summary Judgment; denying as moot Petitioner's 19 Motion for Permanent Injunction; Petitioner's Application for Writ of Habeas Corpus is deni ed and dismissed with prejudice; adopting Magistrate Kaull's 23 Report and Recommendation. This action is stricken from the docket. Judgment is entered for the Respondent. Notice of Appeal must be received within 30 days, along with $455.00, or seek leave to appeal in forma pauperis. Signed by Senior Judge Robert E. Maxwell on 1/23/09. (copy Petitioner)(cnd)
January 5, 2009	Filing 23 OPINION/REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 19 MOTION for Permanent Injunction filed by Sydney Scales, 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Sydney Scales, 18 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Sydney Scales, 6 MOTION to Dismiss and Response to Show Cause Order filed by Wayne A. Phillips. Objections to R&R due by 1/20/2009. Signed by Magistrate Judge John S. Kaull on 1/5/09. (copy Petitioner [7008 0150 0000 3883 6225])(cnd)

Date Filed

Document Text

January 23, 2009

Filing 26 ORDER denying Respondent's 6 Motion to Dismiss; denying Petitioner's 18 Motion for Summary Judgment; denying as moot Petitioner's 19 Motion for Permanent Injunction; Petitioner's Application for Writ of Habeas Corpus is deni ed and dismissed with prejudice; adopting Magistrate Kaull's 23 Report and Recommendation. This action is stricken from the docket. Judgment is entered for the Respondent. Notice of Appeal must be received within 30 days, along with $455.00, or seek leave to appeal in forma pauperis. Signed by Senior Judge Robert E. Maxwell on 1/23/09. (copy Petitioner)(cnd)

January 5, 2009

Filing 23 OPINION/REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 19 MOTION for Permanent Injunction filed by Sydney Scales, 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Sydney Scales, 18 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Sydney Scales, 6 MOTION to Dismiss and Response to Show Cause Order filed by Wayne A. Phillips. Objections to R&R due by 1/20/2009. Signed by Magistrate Judge John S. Kaull on 1/5/09. (copy Petitioner [7008 0150 0000 3883 6225])(cnd)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the West Virginia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Scales v. Phillips
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Petitioner: Sydney Scales
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Respondent: Wayne A. Phillips
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?