Wood v. Commissioner of Social Security
Douglas Clay Wood |
Commissioner of Social Security |
2:2010cv00109 |
September 13, 2010 |
US District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia |
Elkins Office |
Randolph |
Robert E. Maxwell |
John S. Kaull |
Retirement and Survivors Benefits |
42 U.S.C. ยง 0405 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 18 ORDER adopting 17 Report and Recommendations. ORDER denying 13 plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment and granting 15 Commissioner's Motion for Summary Judgment. This court denies and dismisses with prejudice the 1 plaintiff's complaint. Signed by Chief Judge John Preston Bailey on 7/20/11. (jss) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Wood v. Commissioner of Social Security | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Douglas Clay Wood | |
Represented By: | Phillip S. Isner |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.