Gordon v. Tygart Valley Regional Jail et al
||Lisa Wamsley and Tygart Valley Regional Jail
||Jonathan Andrew Gordon
||April 25, 2012
||West Virginia Northern District Court
||Gina M. Groh
||David J. Joel
|Nature of Suit:
|Cause of Action:
|Jury Demanded By:
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|Date Filed||#||Document Text|
|August 8, 2012
ROSEBORO NOTICE: re 11 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Tygart Valley Regional Jail. Within 21 days from the date of this Order, the pro se party shall file any opposition to the motion which shall not exceed 25 pages. Signed by Magistrate Judge David J. Joel on 8/8/2012. Copy sent certified mail, return receipt to pro se Plaintiff. (tlg) (Additional attachment(s) added on 8/8/2012: # 1 certified mail receipt) (tlg).
|March 1, 2013
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION adopting 37 Report and Recommendations; granting 11 Motion to Dismiss; granting 16 Motion to Dismiss; denying 22 Motion for Default Judgment; denying 27 Motion for Default Judgment; and denying 31 Motion for Sanctions. Defendants Tygart Valley Regional Jail and Lisa Wamsley are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE as a party defendant to this action. Clerk to enter judgment in favor of defendants Tygart Valley Regional Jail and Lisa Wamsley. This case is closed and stricken from the active docket of this Court. Signed by District Judge Gina M. Groh on 3/1/2013. Copy mailed to pro se petitioner by CMRR. (cwm) (Additional attachment(s) added on 3/1/2013: # 1 Certified Mail Return Receipt) (cwm).
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the West Virginia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets were retrieved from PACER, and should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.