Gordon v. Tygart Valley Regional Jail et al 
| Plaintiff: |
Jonathan Andrew Gordon |
| Defendants: |
Tygart Valley Regional Jail and Lisa Wamsley |
| |
| Case Number: |
3:2012cv00034 |
| Filed: |
April 25, 2012 |
| |
| Court: |
West Virginia Northern District Court |
| Office: |
Martinsburg Office |
| County: |
Ohio |
| Presiding Judge: |
Gina M. Groh |
| Referring Judge: |
David J. Joel |
| |
| Nature of Suit: |
P. Petitions - Civil Rights |
| Cause: |
42:1983 |
| Jurisdiction: |
Federal Question |
| Jury Demanded By: |
Plaintiff |
| |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download.
| Date Filed | # | Document Text |
|---|
| March 1, 2013 | 39 |  ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION adopting 37 Report and Recommendations; granting 11 Motion to Dismiss; granting 16 Motion to Dismiss; denying 22 Motion for Default Judgment; denying 27 Motion for Default Judgment; and denying 31 Motion for Sanctions. Defendants Tygart Valley Regional Jail and Lisa Wamsley are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE as a party defendant to this action. Clerk to enter judgment in favor of defendants Tygart Valley Regional Jail and Lisa Wamsley. This case is closed and stricken from the active docket of this Court. Signed by District Judge Gina M. Groh on 3/1/2013. Copy mailed to pro se petitioner by CMRR. (cwm) (Additional attachment(s) added on 3/1/2013: # 1 Certified Mail Return Receipt) (cwm). |
| August 8, 2012 | 13 | ROSEBORO NOTICE: re 11 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Tygart Valley Regional Jail. Within 21 days from the date of this Order, the pro se party shall file any opposition to the motion which shall not exceed 25 pages. Signed by Magistrate Judge David J. Joel on 8/8/2012. Copy sent certified mail, return receipt to pro se Plaintiff. (tlg) (Additional attachment(s) added on 8/8/2012: # 1 certified mail receipt) (tlg). |
Last Document Downloaded: March 2, 2013 06:28:01 PST
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to
PACER is required.
Follow case documents by RSS