Markle v. Shenandoah Valley Medical System, Inc. et al

Defendant: Unites States of America
Plaintiff: Patricia Markle
Case Number: 3:2013cv00050
Filed: May 3, 2013
Court: West Virginia Northern District Court
Office: Martinsburg Office
County: Berkeley
Presiding Judge: Gina M. Groh
Nature of Suit: Personal Inj. Med. Malpractice
Cause of Action: 28:1346 Breach of Contract
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
May 30, 2013 9 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER DENYING MOTION 8 TO STAY DISCOVERY AND DEADLINES IN THE FIRST ORDER. Signed by District Judge Gina M. Groh on 5/30/2013. (tlg)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the West Virginia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Markle v. Shenandoah Valley Medical System, Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Unites States of America
Represented By: Helen Campbell Altmeyer
Represented By: Erin K. Reisenweber
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Patricia Markle
Represented By: Christopher T. Nace
Represented By: Barry J. Nace
Represented By: D. Michael Burke
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets were retrieved from PACER, and should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.