Edgell v. Commissioner of Social Security et al
Wallace Alan Edgell |
Commissioner of Social Security |
3:2014cv00082 |
July 22, 2014 |
US District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia |
Martinsburg Office |
Randolph |
James E. Seibert |
Gina M. Groh |
Supplemental Security Income |
42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 31 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER REJECTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION IN PART; denying Plaintiff's 10 Motion for Summary Judgment; granting Commissioner's 23 Motion for Summary Judgment. This matter is DISMISSED with prejudice and stricken from the docket. Signed by Chief Judge Gina M. Groh on 6/23/2015. (tlg) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Edgell v. Commissioner of Social Security et al | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Wallace Alan Edgell | |
Represented By: | Scott A. Curnutte |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.