Hager et al v. Graham et al
5:2005cv00129 |
August 15, 2005 |
US District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia |
Wheeling Office |
Frederick P. Stamp |
Motor Vehicle |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal |
Both |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 105 ORDER: Granting 86 Motion to Compel; defendant directed to respond to Pltffs' Request for Production of Documents Nos. 1 & 2 by 5/12/2010.(copy to counsel, Judge) Signed by Magistrate Judge James E. Seibert on 4/28/2010. (soa) |
Filing 100 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: Denying 79 Motion for Extension of Time to Amend ; and Denying 81 Motion to Amend/Correct. Signed by Senior Judge Frederick P. Stamp, Jr on 4/16/2010. (soa) |
Filing 78 MEMORANDUM OPINION and ORDER: Denying 55 Motion to Dismiss. Signed by Senior Judge Frederick P. Stamp, Jr on 3/2/2010. (soa) |
Filing 45 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT SAFE AUTO INSURANCE CO.'S MOTION FOR LIMITED LIFT OF STAY AND DIRECTING PARTIES TO FILE STATUS REPORT: For the reasons set forth, Safe Auto's 37 and 41 Motions for a Limited Lift of Stay are hereby DENIED. The parties are to file a written status report with this Court on or before June 9, 2009 as to the status of the underlying action. Signed by Senior Judge Frederick P. Stamp, Jr. on 5/26/2009. (Copy to counsel) (kac) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Hager et al v. Graham et al | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.