Jenkins v. US Dist Court
| Elizabeth Jenkins |
| US Dist Court |
| 5:2008cv00122 |
| September 16, 2008 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia |
| Habeas Corpus (General) Office |
| Preston |
| John S. Kaull |
| Frederick P. Stamp |
| None |
| U.S. Government Defendant |
| 28:2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal) |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
10
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL Pla's complaint 1 is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for failure to prosecute. Clerk is DIRECTED to enter judgment. Signed by Senior Judge Frederick P Stamp, Jr on 2/4/09. (c to Judge, JSK, pla by certifed mail)(mji)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Jenkins v. US Dist Court | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Elizabeth Jenkins | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: US Dist Court | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
