Allman et al v. Chancellor Health Partners, Inc.
| Carol J. Allman and Michael Allman |
| Chancellor Health Partners, Inc. and Weirton Health Partners, LLC |
| 5:2008cv00155 |
| October 14, 2008 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia |
| Civil Rights: Jobs Office |
| Brooke |
| Frederick P. Stamp |
| Plaintiff |
| Diversity |
| 28:1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
58
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS AMENDED COMPLAINT, DENYING AS MOOT DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS, OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND DENYING AS MOOT DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR A MORE DEFINITE STATEMENT CONCERNING COUNT THREE. For the reasons set forth, defendants' 20 Motion to Dismiss the Amended Complaint is DENIED. Further, the defendants' 5 Motion for More Definite Statement concerning Count Three of the original complaint is DENIED AS MOOT and, the defendants' 7 Motion to Dismiss, or, in the alternative for summary judgment is also DENIED AS MOOT. Signed by Senior Judge Frederick P. Stamp, Jr. on 5/26/2009. (Copy to counsel) (kac)
|
|
Filing
31
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S 13 MOTION TO REMAND. This Court concludes that the amount in controversy exceeds $75,000.00, exclusive of interests and costs. Accordingly, the plaintiffs' Motion to Remand is DENIED. Signed by Senior Judge Frederick P. Stamp, Jr. on 3/2/2009. (Copy to counsel) (kac)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
