Mey v. Monitronics International, Inc. et al
Diana Mey |
Monitronics International, Inc., Versatile Marketing Solutions, Inc. and United Technologies Corp. |
5:2011cv00090 |
June 24, 2011 |
US District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia |
Wheeling Office |
Ohio |
Irene M. Keeley |
Other Statutory Actions |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
Both |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 223 ORDER/OPINION: Order granting (205) Mey's Motion to Compel in case 5:11-cv-00090-IMK-JSK. Signed by Magistrate Judge John S. Kaull on 1/28/14. Associated Cases: 1:13-md-02493-IMK, 5:11-cv-00090-IMK-JSK(jss) |
Filing 171 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER denying 93 Motion for Summary Judgment and denying 95 Motion for Summary Judgment. The oral argument previously scheduled for Thursday, August 15, 2013 at 9:30 A.M. is CANCELLED. A status Conference has been set f or 8/15/2013 10:00 AM before District Judge Irene M. Keeley. The parties may participate in that statusconference by telephone. If the status conference is to be bytelephone, the Court directs lead counsel for the plaintiff toarrange the conference call and provide dial-in information toall parties and the Court. Signed by District Judge Irene M. Keeley on 8/14/2013. (copy to counsel of record via CM/ECF)(nmm) |
Filing 121 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Denying Mey's 66 Motion to Strike VMS'S offer of judgment, Docket 100 be deemed filed as the second Amended Complaint and Granting May's 88 Motion to file a second amended complaint. Signed by District Judge Irene M. Keeley on 3/22/12. (mji) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.