Mey v. Monitronics International, Inc. et al
Plaintiff: Diana Mey
Defendant: Monitronics International, Inc., Versatile Marketing Solutions, Inc. and United Technologies Corp.
Case Number: 5:2011cv00090
Filed: June 24, 2011
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia
Office: Wheeling Office
County: Ohio
Presiding Judge: Irene M. Keeley
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441
Jury Demanded By: Both

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 28, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 223 ORDER/OPINION: Order granting (205) Mey's Motion to Compel in case 5:11-cv-00090-IMK-JSK. Signed by Magistrate Judge John S. Kaull on 1/28/14. Associated Cases: 1:13-md-02493-IMK, 5:11-cv-00090-IMK-JSK(jss)
August 14, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 171 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER denying 93 Motion for Summary Judgment and denying 95 Motion for Summary Judgment. The oral argument previously scheduled for Thursday, August 15, 2013 at 9:30 A.M. is CANCELLED. A status Conference has been set f or 8/15/2013 10:00 AM before District Judge Irene M. Keeley. The parties may participate in that statusconference by telephone. If the status conference is to be bytelephone, the Court directs lead counsel for the plaintiff toarrange the conference call and provide dial-in information toall parties and the Court. Signed by District Judge Irene M. Keeley on 8/14/2013. (copy to counsel of record via CM/ECF)(nmm)
March 22, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 121 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Denying Mey's 66 Motion to Strike VMS'S offer of judgment, Docket 100 be deemed filed as the second Amended Complaint and Granting May's 88 Motion to file a second amended complaint. Signed by District Judge Irene M. Keeley on 3/22/12. (mji)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the West Virginia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Mey v. Monitronics International, Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Diana Mey
Represented By: Jonathan R Marshall
Represented By: John W. Barrett
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Monitronics International, Inc.
Represented By: Jeffrey A. Holmstrand
Represented By: Phillip T. Glyptis
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Versatile Marketing Solutions, Inc.
Represented By: Clifford F Kinney, Jr
Represented By: Niall A Paul
Represented By: John R. Teare, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: United Technologies Corp.
Represented By: Kristen Lynn Andrews
Represented By: William D. Wilmoth
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?