Weirton Medical Center, Inc. et al v. Trinity Health System, Inc. et al
| Wheeling Hospital, Inc. and Weirton Medical Center, Inc. |
| Acuity Speciality Hospital-Ohio Valley, L.P., Trinity Health System, Inc. and Acuity Healthcare, LP |
| Acuity Healthcare, LP and Acuity Speciality Hospital-Ohio Valley, L.P. |
| Trinity Health System, Inc. |
| Acuity Healthcare, LP and Acuity Speciality Hospital-Ohio Valley, L.P. |
| Weirton Medical Center, Inc. and Wheeling Hospital, Inc. |
| 5:2014cv00087 |
| July 1, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia |
| Wheeling Office |
| Brooke |
| Frederick P. Stamp |
| Other Contract |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1446 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
40
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING 23 DEFENDANT TRINITY HEALTH SYSTEM, INC.S MOTION TO FILE AN AMENDED NOTICE OF REMOVAL, GRANTING 18 PLAINTIFFS MOTION TO REMAND, GRANTING 22 DEFENDANTS ACUITY HEALTHCARE, L.P.S AND ACUITY SPECIALITY HOSPITAL -OHIO VALLEY, L.P.S MOTION FOR JOINDER TO REMAND, DENYING AS MOOT WITHOUT PREJUDICE 7 24 and 27 DEFENDANT TRINITY HEALTH SYSTEM, INC.S MOTION TO DISMISS, MOTION TO DISMISS CROSS-CLAIMS AND MOTION TO SEVER. It is further ORDERED that this civil action be DISMISSED and STRICKEN from the active docket of this Court. The Clerk is DIRECTED to enter judgment on this matter. Signed by Senior Judge Frederick P. Stamp, Jr on 10/15/2014. (copy to counsel of record via CM/ECF) (nmm)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
