Monroe v. Latham et al
Plaintiff: Lavelle Monroe
Defendant: S D McDonald, S D Doyne, CO Emper, CO Latham, C O Peterson and Lt Friend
Case Number: 1:2014cv00116
Filed: February 4, 2014
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin
Office: Green Bay Office
County: Racine
Presiding Judge: William C Griesbach
Nature of Suit: Prison Condition
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 24, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 10 SCREENING ORDER FOR AMENDED COMPLAINT signed by Chief Judge William C Griesbach on 3/24/2014. The US Marshal Service is directed to effect service on the defendant. (cc: Lavelle Monroe, Racine Co Sheriff Christopher Schmaling, Racine County Jail Administrator, Racine County Corporation Counsel via U.S. Mail)(Griesbach, William)
February 25, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER granting 2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this action be and hereby is DISMISSED pursuant to28 U.S.C. §§ 1915(e)(2)(B) and 1915A(b)(1) for failure to state a claim, but without prejudice. If Plaintiff can state a claim, he may file an amended complaint within 30 days of this order. If he fails to do so, the dismissal will be with prejudice. (cc: all counsel and via US Mail to Lavelle Monroe, Racine Co Sheriff, and AAG Finkelmeyer, ) (Griesbach, William)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Wisconsin Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Monroe v. Latham et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: S D McDonald
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: S D Doyne
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: CO Emper
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: CO Latham
Represented By: Wisconsin Dept of Justice - 1983 Actions
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: C O Peterson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Lt Friend
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Lavelle Monroe
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?