US District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin

Cases filed
Cases 1 - 10 of 31,681
Johnson v. Albolino
as 2:2024cv01167
Plaintiff: Robert W Johnson
Defendant: Officer K Albolino
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Johnson v. Argonaut Insurance Company
as 2:2024cv01168
Plaintiff: Robert W Johnson
Defendant: Argonaut Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01166
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01169
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 American Disabilities Act
Padilla v. Judge
as 2:2024cv01165
Petitioner: Philip J Padilla
Respondent: Michael T Judge
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jackson v. Layng We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2024cv01089
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158 Notice of Appeal re Bankruptcy Matter (BA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01163
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 American Disabilities Act
Ruppa v. Window Solutions, Inc. d/b/a Renewal by Andersen of Greater WI & Milwaukee
as 2:2024cv01161
Plaintiff: Anderson J. Ruppa
Defendant: Window Solutions, Inc. d/b/a Renewal by Andersen of Greater WI & Milwaukee
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Lopez v. Cahak
as 2:2024cv01164
Petitioner: Marco A Lopez, Sr
Respondent: Warden Brian Cahak
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hyatt v. Evers et al
as 2:2024cv01162
Defendant: Tim Malchow, James Schwochert, Cindy O'Donnell and others
Plaintiff: Jason J Hyatt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?