Collins v. Advocate Aurora Health Inc et al
Shawanda V Collins |
Advocate Aurora Health Inc, Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, State of Wisconsin Department of Health Services, Zia Z Turgut, Felisa Antonchorgy, Hope Borland, Nanette Kloth, Elizabeth Hafemann, Michael T Cicero, Kern Reid, Al Bugazia, Mounika Paravastu, Ann M Paprocki, Abdul Hafeez Qureshi, Tamra Swistowiczis, Michele Stickell, Adebola Akinyemi, Emma Allen, Ariel Kennedy, Lindsey Hoffman, Kelly Terrab and Ashley Ayres |
2:2024cv00490 |
April 24, 2024 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin |
Brett H Ludwig |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 24, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 1 PRO SE COMPLAINT against Advocate Aurora Health Inc, Adebola Akinyemi, Emma Allen, Felisa Antonchorgy, Ashley Ayres, Hope Borland, Al Bugazia, Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Michael T Cicero, Elizabeth Hafemann, Lindsey Hoffman, Ariel Kennedy, Nanette Kloth, Ann M Paprocki, Mounika Paravastu, Abdul Hafeez Qureshi, Kern Reid, State of Wisconsin Department of Health Services, Michele Stickell, Tamra Swistowiczis, Kelly Terrab, Zia Z Turgut filed by Shawanda V Collins. Jury Demand. Consent forms distributed for Magistrate Judge Stephen C Dries. (Filing Fee PAID ; Receipt No. 95346) (Service Packet Issued) (Attachments: #1 Exhibits A-C, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(kah) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.