US District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin
Cases 21 - 30 of 31,014
Brown v. Gloudemans et al
as 2:2024cv00480
Plaintiff:
William Brown
Defendant:
Captain Gloudemans, B Eversor, Mr Horton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Knutson v. Brown County Sheriffs Department et al
as 2:2024cv00481
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Knutson
Defendant:
Brown County Sheriffs Department and Vital Core
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hess v. MedTorque Inc
as 2:2024cv00473
Plaintiff:
Daniel Hess
Defendant:
MedTorque Inc
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00465
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Wood v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2024cv00467
Plaintiff:
Eric S. Wood
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Suprise v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv00466
Plaintiff:
Stephanie M Suprise
Defendant:
Martin J O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Comer v. Hagerty Inc
as 2:2024cv00468
Plaintiff:
Colin Comer
Defendant:
Hagerty, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00469
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Carroll v. Wisconsin Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2024cv00471
Plaintiff:
Jermichael Carroll
Defendant:
Wisconsin Department of Corrections, Kevin A Carr, Jared Hoy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Walker v. Briggs et al
as 2:2024cv00472
Plaintiff:
Eric Darcell Walker, Jr
Defendant:
Director Briggs, Warden Jason Benzel, CO B Kapolnek and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
