Walton v. Nehls
Plaintiff: David Christopher Lee Walton
Defendant: Ashley Nehls
Case Number: 1:2022cv00007
Filed: January 4, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin
Presiding Judge: William C Griesbach
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Conditions of Confinement
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 20, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 11, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 10 TRANSMIT #1 Prisoner Complaint, Notice, Waiver, Magistrate Form, #7 Screening Order, and #9 Order. (tlf)
February 11, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER DIRECTING SERVICE signed by Judge William C Griesbach on 2/11/2022. The US Marshal Service is directed to effect service on Defendant Ashley Nehls. (cc: all counsel and mailed to pro se party)(Griesbach, William)
February 10, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 8 NON-ACCEPTANCE OF SERVICE Under Memorandum of Understanding as to Ashley Nehls (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service)(Peacock, Ann)
February 2, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 7 SCREENING ORDER signed by Judge William C Griesbach on 2/2/2022 Granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed Without Prepayment of the Filing Fee. Nehls shall file a responsive pleading to the complaint within 60 days. (cc: all counsel and mailed to pro se party with prisoner guide, Officer in Charge)(Griesbach, William)
January 25, 2022 Opinion or Order INITIAL PARTIAL FILING FEE Received: $14.65, receipt number GB4689-005915; the payment of all future filing fees will be maintained by the financial department (lh)
January 14, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER that within 30 days plaintiff shall forward to the Clerk of Court the sum of $ 14.65 as an initial partial filing fee in this action signed by Judge William C Griesbach on 1/14/2022. (cc: all counsel and mailed to pro se party and warden)(Griesbach, William)
January 13, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 5 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by David Christopher Lee Walton. (lh)
January 7, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 4 Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form filed by David Christopher Lee Walton. (NOTICE: Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 73 this document is not viewable by the judge.) (mac)
January 4, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 3 LETTER from the Clerk to David Christopher Lee Walton requesting that he submit the consent/refusal form for Magistrate Judge Stephen C Dries within 21 days. Plaintiff must also submit his six-month certified trust account statement. (tlf)
January 4, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed Without Prepayment of the Filing Fee by David Christopher Lee Walton. (tlf)
January 4, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 1 PRISONER COMPLAINT with jury demand filed against Ashley Nehls by David Christopher Lee Walton. (tlf)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Wisconsin Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Walton v. Nehls
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: David Christopher Lee Walton
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Ashley Nehls
Represented By: Wisconsin Dept of Justice - 1983 Actions
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?