Union Pacific Railroad Company v. Brahm International Ltd

Plaintiff: Union Pacific Railroad Company
Defendant: Brahm International Ltd
Case Number: 2:2008cv00938
Filed: November 3, 2008
Court: Wisconsin Eastern District Court
Office: Commerce ICC Rates, Etc. Office
County: XX US, Outside State
Presiding Judge: Lynn Adelman
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: 28:1337 Sherman-Clayton Act

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
January 26, 2010 17 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER that plaintiff may recover costs of $543.00 signed by Judge Lynn Adelman on 1/26/10. (cc: all counsel)(Wesolek, Marie)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Wisconsin Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Union Pacific Railroad Company v. Brahm International Ltd
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Union Pacific Railroad Company
Represented By: Kyle Wallor
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Brahm International Ltd
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets were retrieved from PACER, and should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.