MGS MFG Group Inc v. Supermax Corporation de Mexico SA de CV

Plaintiff: MGS MFG Group Inc
Defendant: Supermax Corporation de Mexico SA de CV
Case Number: 2:2009cv00174
Filed: February 20, 2009
Court: Wisconsin Eastern District Court
Office: Negotiable Instrument Office
County: Washington
Presiding Judge: J P Stadtmueller
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: Diversity
Jury Demanded By: 28:1332 Diversity-Negotiable Instrument

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
February 23, 2010 6 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER signed by Judge J P Stadtmueller on 2/23/10 that plaintiff complete service of process on the defendant by 5/1/10 or the plaintiff's case will be dismissed without prejudice. (cc: all counsel)(nm)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Wisconsin Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: MGS MFG Group Inc v. Supermax Corporation de Mexico SA de CV
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: MGS MFG Group Inc
Represented By: Matthew R Jelenchick
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Supermax Corporation de Mexico SA de CV
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets were retrieved from PACER, and should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.