Jones v. Schwochert

Jones v. Schwochert

Petitioner:	Fred L Jones
Respondent:	James Schwochert
Case Number:	2:2012cv01310
Filed:	December 26, 2012
Court:	US District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin
Office:	Milwaukee Office
County:	Fond du Lac
Presiding Judge:	Lynn Adelman
Nature of Suit:	Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
April 3, 2013	Filing 16 ORDER signed by Judge Lynn Adelman on 4/2/13 denying without prejudice 9 , 13 Motions to Appoint Counsel; denying as moot 12 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis; granting 14 Motion for Extension of Time. Petitioner's brief due 6/3/13. Respondent's opposing brief due 45 days after filing of petitioner's brief and Petitioner's reply due 30 days after respondent's brief. (cc: all counsel, via USPS to petitioner) (dm)
February 5, 2013	Filing 5 ORDER signed by Judge Lynn Adelman on 2/5/13 that within thirty (30) days of the date of this order respondent ANSWER the petition showing cause why the writ should not issue. Further ordering the parties to abide by the briefing schedule set forth in the order, if warranted. (cc: all counsel, via USPS to petitioner)(dm)

Date Filed

Document Text

April 3, 2013

Filing 16 ORDER signed by Judge Lynn Adelman on 4/2/13 denying without prejudice 9 , 13 Motions to Appoint Counsel; denying as moot 12 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis; granting 14 Motion for Extension of Time. Petitioner's brief due 6/3/13. Respondent's opposing brief due 45 days after filing of petitioner's brief and Petitioner's reply due 30 days after respondent's brief. (cc: all counsel, via USPS to petitioner) (dm)

February 5, 2013

Filing 5 ORDER signed by Judge Lynn Adelman on 2/5/13 that within thirty (30) days of the date of this order respondent ANSWER the petition showing cause why the writ should not issue. Further ordering the parties to abide by the briefing schedule set forth in the order, if warranted. (cc: all counsel, via USPS to petitioner)(dm)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Wisconsin Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Jones v. Schwochert
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Respondent: James Schwochert
Represented By:	Wisconsin Dept of Justice - Habeas
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Petitioner: Fred L Jones
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?