Famous v. Zohia et al
Ronnie Famous |
Doe Zohia, Richard Heidorn, Doe Waterford, Jane Doe Nurse, Andrew Kessler, Kathy Brester, Michael Baenen, Jeananne Zwiers, Dave Burnett, James Richter and Estate of James Wong |
2:2013cv00195 |
February 22, 2013 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin |
Milwaukee Office |
Winnebago |
Rudolph T Randa |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 98 ORDER DISMISSING CASE signed by Judge Rudolph T. Randa on 8/18/2015. 66 71 Defendants' MOTIONS for Summary Judgment GRANTED; 86 Plaintiff's MOTION to Withdraw as Attorney GRANTED. Doe Waterford, Doe Zohia, Estate of James Wong and Jane Doe Nurse DISMISSED. (cc: all counsel, via mail to Ronnie Famous at Wisconsin Resource Center)(cb) |
Filing 95 ORDER signed by Judge Rudolph T. Randa on 6/25/2015. 92 Famous' MOTION to Appoint Counsel DENIED; 92 Famous' MOTION for Reconsideration DENIED. 93 Famous' MOTION for Physical Examination DENIED. By 7/6/2015 Famous to inform the Court whether he wants Attorney Newbold to respond to defendants' summary judgment motion. (cc: all counsel, via mail to Ronnie Famous at Wisconsin Resource Center)(cb) |
Filing 39 ORDER that this case is transferred to the Green Bay Division of the Eastern District of Wisconsin. Signed by District Judge William M. Conley on 2/15/2013. (jef),(ps) [Transferred from wiwd on 2/22/2013.] |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.