Lilley v. Waukesha County

Defendant: Waukesha County
Plaintiff: Alyce Lilley
Case Number: 2:2013cv00441
Filed: April 22, 2013
Court: Wisconsin Eastern District Court
Office: Milwaukee Office
County: Waukesha
Presiding Judge: J P Stadtmueller
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 42:2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
April 25, 2014 85 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER signed by Judge J P Stadtmueller on 4/25/14: granting nunc pro tunc 54 Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to File a surreply brief; granting 24 Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment; and, denying as moot 56 and 58 the parties' Motions in Limine. See Order. (cc: all counsel) (nm)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Wisconsin Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Lilley v. Waukesha County
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Waukesha County
Represented By: Mary E Nelson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Alyce Lilley
Represented By: Kelly L Lowery
Represented By: Janice M Pintar
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets were retrieved from PACER, and should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.