RMS Inc v. Shea-Kiewit Joint Venture et al
| RMS Inc |
| Shea-Kiewit Joint Venture, JF Shea Construction and Kiewit Infrastructure Co |
| 2:2013cv01071 |
| September 24, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin |
| Milwaukee Office |
| Waukesha |
| Charles N Clevert |
| Other Fraud |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
191
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy Joseph on 6/9/2016 regarding the parties' motions in limine 169 , 176 . PLEASE SEE ORDER. (cc: all counsel) (llc)
|
|
Filing
168
DECISION AND ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy Joseph on 5/16/2016 granting 89 MOTION to Strike Plaintiff's Damages Expert Michael Betters. (cc: all counsel) (llc)
|
|
Filing
164
DECISION AND ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy Joseph on 4/22/2016 granting in part and denying in part plaintiff's Daubert motion 84 . RMS' Daubert motion to exclude the testimony of Stuart Lipofsky as to interpretation of the subc ontract and construction industry practice regarding labor unions is DENIED AS MOOT and RMS' Daubert motion to preclude Lipofsky from testifying as an expert as to the defendants' damages on its counterclaim is GRANTED. RMS' Daubert motion striking paragraphs 3-5, 30-37, and 56-59 from the expert report of Terence Rodgers and precluding Rodgers from testifying on those subjects is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Court will hold an evidentiary hearing as to the defenda nts' motion to strike RMS' damages expert, Michael Betters. The Clerk of Court will contact the parties to arrange scheduling this hearing. Three days before the hearing, the parties are to submit a letter indicating the names of the witnesses that will appear and an estimate of the amount of court time the hearing will take. (cc: all counsel) (llc)
|
|
Filing
163
DECISION AND ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy Joseph on 3/31/2016 denying 154 Motion for Reconsideration. (cc: all counsel) (llc)
|
|
Filing
150
DECISION AND ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy Joseph on 12/31/2015 granting 79 plaintiff's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment; granting defendants' 93 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment. (cc: all counsel) (llc)
|
|
Filing
109
DECISION AND ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy Joseph on 6/9/2015 denying 73 Motion to Compel. (cc: all counsel) (llc)
|
|
Filing
106
DECISION AND ORDER on Defendants' Motion to Compel 73 signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy Joseph on 6/1/2015. IT IS ORDERED that the defendants' motion to compel is GRANTED to the extent that no later than June 8, 2015, RMS must produce for in camera inspection the October 2012 correspondence from Attorney Antonopoulos to the FBI. (cc: all counsel)(llc)
|
|
Filing
67
DECISION AND ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy Joseph on 2/3/2015 granting 64 Motion for Leave to File a Third Amended Complaint. (cc: all counsel) (llc)
|
|
Filing
63
DECISION AND ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy Joseph on 10/29/2014 granting 58 Motion for Protective Order; denying 61 Motion for Leave to File Reply Declaration. (cc: all counsel) (llc)
|
|
Filing
57
DECISION AND ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy Joseph on 9/24/2014 granting 40 Motion for Protective Order as to Attorney Fitzgerald's communications; granting in part and denying in part 41 Motion to Compel. As to Attorney Fitzgerald's communications, the plaintiff's motion is denied. As to the subcontract and payroll information, the plaintiff's motion is granted. (cc: all counsel) (llc)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
