Building Trades United Pension Trust Fund et al v. Hahn's Badger Carpet Service Inc
| Building Trades United Pension Trust Fund, Scott Redman and Industry Advancement Program Contract Administration Fund |
| Hahn's Badger Carpet Service Inc |
| 2:2014cv01514 |
| December 5, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin |
| Milwaukee Office |
| Waukesha |
| Lynn Adelman |
| Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 1132 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
6
ORDER signed by Judge Lynn Adelman on 12/30/14 that within twenty-one days from the date of this order Hahns Badger Carpet Service, Inc. either (1) confirm in writing with the court that Hahn is a licensed attorney, and have her sign the response let ter on its behalf, or (2) appear by counsel and correct the response letter by one of the methods described above. Further ordering that Hahns answer to the complaint is extended until twenty-one days from the date of this order; no default may be e ntered until this time period has expired. Finally ordering that if Hahns fails to comply with this order within twenty-one days, the response letter currently in the file shall automatically be stricken without further order and default judgment may result. (cc: all counsel, via USPS to defendant)(dm)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
