Cases 1 - 10 of 2,915
ADAMS v. TRANT
as 1:2009cv00779
Plaintiff:
ERIC ADAMS
Defendant:
HEATHER TRANT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PHILLIPS v. KASCO et al
as 1:2009cv00774
Plaintiff:
SHAWN A. PHILLIPS
Defendant:
MICHAEL KASCO, EIGHT UNKNOWN and CATHY L. LANIER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RODRIQUEZ v. REESE et al
as 1:2009cv00801
Plaintiff:
JUAN RODRIQUEZ
Defendant:
CONSTANCE REESE, NAME UNKNOWN and HARELY G. LAPPIN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Demetrius McLaughlin v. US Department of Justice, et al
as 09-5150
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Demetrius McLaughlin
Defendant - Appellee:
United States Department of Justice and Executive Office of the United States Attorneys
COLTER v. THIRD DISTRICT POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 1:2009cv00777
Plaintiff:
ALAN COLTER
Defendant:
THIRD DISTRICT POLICE DEPARTMENT, ANTOINE WESTON, SCOTT EARHARDT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PHILLIPS v. UNITED STATES et al
as 1:2009cv00773
Plaintiff:
SHAWN A. PHILLIPS
Defendant:
UNITED STATES and U.S. PAROLE COMMISSION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
PIPPENGER v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2009cv00775
Plaintiff:
BRANYON D. PIPPENGER
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and USDC FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH DAKOTA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv00770
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
LUCAS v. MARTINEZ
as 1:2009cv00768
Petitioner:
LARRY LUCAS
Respondent:
RICARDO MARTINEZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
APPLEWHITE v. BIVENS et al
as 1:2009cv00766
Plaintiff:
MARC E. APPLEWHITE
Defendant:
SHAMEKA BIVENS, HATCHER and CCA/CTF CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
