Cases 1 - 10 of 3,007
Markel American Insurance Company v. Beal et al
as 1:2009cv00201
Plaintiff:
Markel American Insurance Company
Defendant:
Glen Beal and Vladimir Nadkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Admiralty
Monette v. Mossberg Corporation et al
as 2:2009cv00199
Plaintiff:
James Monette
Defendant:
Mossberg Corporation, Maverick Arms Inc, Wal-Mart Stores Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Product Liability
Chace v. First Horizon Home Loans et al
as 1:2009cv00195
Plaintiff:
Mary Chace
Defendant:
First Horizon Home Loans, First Horizon Home Loan Corporation, Metlife and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Skeen v. Astrue
as 2:2009cv00197
Plaintiff:
Sean Skeen
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Milstead v. Guyer
as 3:2009cv00198
Plaintiff:
Christopher R Milstead
Defendant:
Lynn Guyer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Roberts et al v. United States of America et al
as 1:2009cv00194
Plaintiff:
Charles Roberts, Charles Roberts, Charles Roberts and others
Defendant:
United States of America and Mercy Medical Center, Nampa
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Matthews v. Colson
as 3:2009cv00196
Plaintiff:
Terrence Matthews
Defendant:
Chris Colson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mulroy v. USA
as 1:2009cv00192
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Brenten Michael Mulroy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Giron-Sanchez v. USA
as 4:2009cv00193
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Manuel De Jesus Giron-Sanchez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Quinonez v. USA
as 4:2009cv00200
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Benjamin Quinonez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
