Cases 11 - 20 of 1,147
Hirani v. Lando et al
as 1:2024cv01948
Defendant:
Zvi Lando, Ronen Faier, Nadav Zafrir and others
Plaintiff:
Abdul Hirani
Abbey v. Aldag et al
as 1:2024cv01589
Plaintiff:
Kyle Abbey
Defendant:
Edward, Jr. K. Aldag, J. Kevin Hanna, R. Steven Hamner and others
Karp v. Cangemi et al
as 1:2024cv01421
Plaintiff:
Selwyn Karp and Herbert Stein
Defendant:
Thomas R. Cangemi, John J. Pinto, Alessandro P. Dinello and others
Interested Party:
Robert Garfield
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Wang v. Cangemi et al
as 1:2024cv01422
Plaintiff:
Elaine Wang and Herbert Stein
Defendant:
Thomas R. Cangemi, Alessandro P. Dinello, James J. Carpenter and others
Interested Party:
Robert Garfield
Pierce v. Cangemi et al
as 1:2024cv01408
Plaintiff:
Aaron Pierce and Herbert Stein
Defendant:
Thomas R. Cangemi, Alessandro P. Dinello, James J. Carpenter and others
Interested Party:
Robert Garfield
Powell v. DeWees et al
as 1:2024cv01338
Plaintiff:
WESLEY POWELL
Defendant:
John DeWees, JOHN CAMPBELL and KARL GEE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 fd Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
Hauser v. Cangemi et al
as 1:2024cv01207
Plaintiff:
Joseph Hauser and Herbert Stein
Defendant:
Thomas R. Cangemi, John J. Pinto, Alessandro P. Dinello and others
Interested Party:
Robert Garfield
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Porteous v. Lebovits et al
as 1:2024cv01095
Plaintiff:
Mhairi Porteous
Defendant:
Chaim Lebovits, Stacy Lindborg, Ralph Kern and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Fowler v. BioXcel Therapeutics, Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv00203
Plaintiff:
KELLY FOWLER
Defendant:
June Bray, Sandeep Laumas, Vimal Mehta and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Securities Violation
Andrev v. Lebovits et al
as 1:2024cv01101
Plaintiff:
Serge Andrev
Defendant:
Chaim Lebovits, Stacy Lindborg, Ralph Kern and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
