Cases 41 - 50 of 1,551
Catherine M. Sugarbaker Family Trust, Michael Mongiello Trustee v. Jennifer W. Rumsey et al
as 2:2024cv00975
Plaintiff:
Catherine M. Sugarbaker Family Trust, Michael Mongiello Trustee, U/A DTD and Catherine M. Sugarbaker Family Trust, Michael Mongiello Trustee
Defendant:
Jennifer W. Rumsey, N. Thomas Linebarger, Mark A. Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity - Stockholders Suits
Batchelor, Jr. v. York Holding, Ltd. et al
as 2:2024cv00239
Plaintiff:
William A. Batchelor, Jr.
Defendant:
York Holding, Ltd., Changqing Liu, Rayford International Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Cole et al v. Johns et al
as 3:2024cv00598
Plaintiff:
Michael Cole, Hawaiian Electric Industries, Inc. and Hawaiian Electric Company, Inc.
Defendant:
Timothy E. Johns, James A. Ajello, Scott W. H. Seu and others
Beall v. Faricy et al
as 3:2024cv00302
Plaintiff:
Ashley Beall
Defendant:
Peter Faricy, Nathaniel Anschuetz, Jonathan Bram and others
Interested Party:
Jianping Ma
Jianping v. Faricy et al
as 3:2024cv00244
Plaintiff:
Ma Jianping
Defendant:
Peter Faricy, Guthrie Dundas, Elizabeth Eby and others
McGuire v. Labe et al.
as 4:2024cv00245
Plaintiff:
John McGuire
Defendant:
James Labe, Christopher Matheiu, Sajal Srivastava and others
Ma v. Faricy et al
as 3:2024cv00247
Plaintiff:
Jianping Ma
Defendant:
Peter Faricy, Guthrie Dundas, Elizabeth Eby and others
Yates v. Romano et al
as 3:2024cv00149
Plaintiff:
Joann C. Yates
Defendant:
Pasquale Romano, Rex S. Jackson, Roxane Bowman and others
Yats v. Romano et al
as 5:2024cv00148
Plaintiff:
C. Joann Yats
Defendant:
Pasquale Romano, Rex S. Jackson, Roxane Bowman and others
Jeewa v. Newcomer et al
as 2:2023cv02129
Plaintiff:
Mo Jeewa
Defendant:
Mark R. Newcomer, Mark Attinger, Daniel H. Spence and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity - Stockholders Suits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
