Cases 1 - 10 of 157
Mzaouak v. Im et al
as 2:2023cv04526
Plaintiff:
Mostafa Mzaouak
Defendant:
Michael Im, JOHN DOES 1-10 and ABC CORP.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
LeBOON et al v. WILLIAMS et al
as 2:2023cv04391
Plaintiff:
PETER LeBOON and PATRICIA LeBOON
Defendant:
BRYAN WILLIAMS, UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC. and JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
JACKSON, JR. v. WESTERN EXPRESS, INC. et al
as 2:2023cv01872
Plaintiff:
HARRY J. JACKSON, JR.
Defendant:
WESTERN EXPRESS, INC. and CHEICK YAMEOGO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
LUCAS v. BATRES et al
as 2:2023cv01098
Plaintiff:
JAMES LUCAS
Defendant:
JAIME BATRES and WENDY CLOUSER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
WILD v. BABB et al
as 2:2023cv00557
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER WILD
Defendant:
OMAR BABB, WINSLOW BABB and WENDY BABB
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
THOMPSON v. P.E. KRAMME, INC.
as 2:2022cv04621
Plaintiff:
TWANAKAY THOMPSON
Defendant:
P.E. KRAMME, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
TAYLOR et al v. MYERS et al
as 2:2022cv03674
Plaintiff:
CYNTHIA TAYLOR and WILLIE JOHNSON
Defendant:
CURTIS LYNN MYERS and RIGGS DISTLER & COMPANY, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
MATHES et al v. WILLS et al
as 2:2022cv03655
Plaintiff:
PAUL MATHES and HOLI MATHES
Defendant:
AIDAN WILLS and BLAKE BARSTAR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
BANKS v. SCHWARTZ ENTERPRISES, INC. et al
as 2:2022cv01938
Plaintiff:
RYAN BANKS
Defendant:
SCHWARTZ ENTERPRISES, INC. and DOMINGO ROCAROCA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
BAY v. CORONADO-FRANCISCO et al
as 2:2021cv05572
Plaintiff:
YVONNE BAY
Defendant:
JOSMAIRY CORONADO-FRANCISCO, JEAN PAULINO and JOSMAIRY CORONADO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
