Cases 21 - 30 of 6,872
MATHES et al v. WILLS et al
as 2:2022cv03655
Plaintiff:
PAUL MATHES and HOLI MATHES
Defendant:
AIDAN WILLS and BLAKE BARSTAR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
SCOTT v. BAILEY et al
as 2:2022cv03654
Plaintiff:
NORMAN LEE SCOTT, SR
Defendant:
WHITNEY R BAILEY, DONALD GLOVER and THE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
Valentine v. VisionQuest National, LTD.
as 2:2022cv01998
Plaintiff:
CARLOS VALENTINE
Defendant:
VISIONQUEST NATIONAL LTD,
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
JONES v. SUNBEAM PRODUCTS, INC.
as 2:2022cv01962
Plaintiff:
TIFFANY JONES
Defendant:
SUNBEAM PRODUCTS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
BANKS v. SCHWARTZ ENTERPRISES, INC. et al
as 2:2022cv01938
Plaintiff:
RYAN BANKS
Defendant:
SCHWARTZ ENTERPRISES, INC. and DOMINGO ROCAROCA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
BAY v. CORONADO-FRANCISCO et al
as 2:2021cv05572
Plaintiff:
YVONNE BAY
Defendant:
JOSMAIRY CORONADO-FRANCISCO, JEAN PAULINO and JOSMAIRY CORONADO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
REEVES et al v. AGENCY INSURANCE COMPANY OF MARYLAND, INC.
as 2:2021cv05378
Plaintiff:
FRANKLIN REEVES and SHINETTA BROWN
Defendant:
AGENCY INSURANCE COMPANY OF MARYLAND, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
El-Khoury v. FK Intermediate, LLC d/b/a Fireking Security Group
as 2:2021cv05323
Plaintiff:
Rosaline El-Khoury
Defendant:
FK Intermediate, LLC d/b/a Fireking Security Group
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
KIM v. DIOP et al
as 2:2021cv05066
Plaintiff:
ELIZABETH KIM
Defendant:
MAMADOU M DIOP and LYFT INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MCGILBERRY v. TARGET CORPORATION
as 2:2021cv05050
Plaintiff:
DAVID MCGILBERRY
Defendant:
TARGARET CORPORATION and TARGET CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
