Cases 11 - 20 of 24
IFONE NEDA Internet Service, Inc. et al v. Army & Air Force Exchange Service et al
as 4:2021cv00330
Defendant:
Matthew T. Adamczyk, Lt. Col, Department of the Army, Kristin Mazur and others
Plaintiff:
IFONE NEDA Internet Service, Inc. and IFONE, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Hernandez v. Wolf et al
as 4:2020cv02852
Defendant:
Wallace L. Carroll, Kenneth T. Cuccinelli and Chad F. Wolf
Plaintiff:
Marvin Isabel Hernandez
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Enriquez Turcios et al v. Wolf et al Example:
as 4:2020cv01982
Defendant:
Acting Commissioner Mark A. Morgan, Donald Trump, William P. Barr and others
Plaintiff:
Jose Enriquez, Josue Enriquez, Elba Guerrero Alvarado and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Cruz v. McAleenan et al
as 4:2019cv04123
Defendant:
Wallace L. Carroll, Kenneth T. Cuccinelli and Kevin McAleenan
Plaintiff:
Gloria Isabel Cruz
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Bonilla v. McAleenan et al
as 4:2019cv03012
Defendant:
Kenneth Cuccinelli, Kevin McAleenan and Wallace L. Carroll
Plaintiff:
Buenaventura Bonilla
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Gindo v. Aecom Technology Corp. et al
as 4:2019cv01745
Defendant:
Continental Insurance Company, Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs, U S Department of Labor and Aecom Technology Corp.
Plaintiff:
George Gindo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 7422
Duron v. Nielsen et al
as 4:2019cv00272
Defendant:
USCIS Director Lee Cissna, Kirstjen Nielsen and Mark Siegl
Plaintiff:
Gloria Del Carmen Duron
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Maghareh et al v. Azar
as 4:2019cv00238
Plaintiff:
Karim Maghareh and BestCare Laboratory Services, LLC
Defendant:
Alex Azar
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2005
Williams v. Berryhill
as 4:2018cv03317
Petitioner:
Eric Williams
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Ypina v. Pompeo et al
as 4:2018cv03046
Plaintiff:
Ascension Ypina
Defendant:
Mike Pompeo and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
