Cases 1 - 10 of 188
Trinh v. CITGO Petroleum Corporation et al
as 4:2024mc00490
Plaintiff:
Van Thi-Hanh Trinh
Defendant:
CITGO Petroleum Corporation and Daniel Fleming
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Texas v. Colony Ridge, Inc. et al
as 4:2024cv00941
Plaintiff:
STATE OF TEXAS
Defendant:
Colony Ridge, Inc., Colony Ridge Development, LLC, Colony Ridge BV, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Khan v. Qatar Airways Corporation
as 4:2023cv04138
Plaintiff:
Mariam Khan
Defendant:
Qatar Airways Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Contract Default
United States of America v. Yen
as 4:2023cv03819
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Ko Chung Yen
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3545 Action to Recovery Money
United States of America v. Torres
as 4:2023cv03820
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Edgar Torres
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3545 Action to Recovery Money
Goodwin v. General Motors, LLC
as 4:2023cv03642
Plaintiff:
Mark Goodwin
Defendant:
General Motors, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Carroll et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 4:2023cv03596
Plaintiff:
Robert Carroll and Eileen Carroll
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Flores v. Seaford Bagels, Inc.
as 4:2023cv01858
Plaintiff:
Sandra Flores
Defendant:
Seaford Bagels, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Thomas v. Perez et al
as 4:2023cv01580
Plaintiff:
Nathan Thomas
Defendant:
jinsop Perez, SynchroGrid, Inc. and Synchrogrid Limited LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Alzobaidi v. U S Department of State et al
as 4:2023cv01061
Plaintiff:
Omar Ahmed Alzobaidi
Defendant:
U S Department of State, United States Embassy in Djibouti, Attorney General of the United States in Washington D C and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
