Social Security Cases filed in the US District Court for the Southern District of Texas Before Judge Kenneth Hoyt
Cases 1 - 10 of 88
Leal v. Saul We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 6:2020cv00025
Defendant: Andrew Saul
Plaintiff: Pedro Garza Leal
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Wells v. Saul We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 6:2020cv00014
Plaintiff: Cheryl Wells
Defendant: Andrew M. Saul
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Stapleton v. Social Security Adminstration Commissioner
as 6:2018cv00018
Plaintiff: Lois J. Stapleton
Defendant: Social Security Adminstration Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Stapleton v. Berryhill
as 6:2018mc00003
Plaintiff: Lois J. Stapleton
Defendant: Nancy A. Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Mitchell v. Colvin
as 4:2015mc00018
Plaintiff: Queen Mitchell
Defendant: Carolyn W Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Jones v. Astrue We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2013cv00034
Plaintiff: Rachelle H. Jones
Defendant: Michael J Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Burns v. Astrue We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2012cv03435
Plaintiff: Bonnie M. Burns
Defendant: Michael J Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Smith v. Astrue
as 4:2012cv03290
Plaintiff: Michael Bryan Smith
Defendant: Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7405 Recovery of Overpayment of Taxes
Erdman v. Social Security Administration
as 4:2012cv03273
Plaintiff: Dennis Guy Erdman
Defendant: Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Williams v. Astrue
as 4:2012cv03299
Plaintiff: Richard A Williams
Defendant: Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?