Cases 11 - 20 of 780
Scanlon v. State of Vermont
as 2:2023cv00570
Petitioner:
Kip Scanlon
Respondent:
State of Vermont
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Highley v. BAART's Clinic et al
as 2:2023cv00569
Plaintiff:
Frank W Highley
Defendant:
BAART's Clinic and Dr. Genevieve Kelly
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Highley v. Deml
as 2:2023cv00461
Plaintiff:
Frank Wayne Highley, Jr.
Defendant:
Nicholas Deml
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Kaseen v. Deml et al
as 2:2023cv00416
Plaintiff:
King Kaseen
Defendant:
Nicholas Deml, Phil Scott, Jennifer Sprafke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Zampieri v. United States of America
as 2:2023cv00360
Petitioner:
Jonathan Zampieri
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Abdul-Kareem v. Vermont
as 2:2023cv00328
Petitioner:
Misbah Abdul-Kareem
Respondent:
State of Vermont
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Fiore v. United States of America
as 2:2023cv00220
Petitioner:
Sean Fiore
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Lewis v. Lyon et al
as 2:2023cv00138
Plaintiff:
Michael J. Lewis
Defendant:
Michael Lyon, Michaela Merrill and Chantel Wood
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Gravel v. Hearst Television, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv00108
Plaintiff:
Eric Gravel
Defendant:
Hearst Television, Inc., City of Winooski, Vermont, Town of Colchester, Vermont and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Trevathan v. CoreCivic of Tennessee et al
as 2:2023cv00100
Plaintiff:
Rayshunn Trevathan
Defendant:
CoreCivic of Tennessee, Nicholas Deml, Martin Frink and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
