Cases 1 - 10 of 59,661
Fisher v. KN Express, Inc. et al.
as 3:2024cv00974
Plaintiff:
Executor Kent Fisher
Defendant:
KN Express, Inc. and Pritpal Singh
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Wrongful Death
Shields v. C.R. Bard Inc et al
as 2:2024cv03128
Plaintiff:
David Shields
Defendant:
C.R. Bard Inc and Davol Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Youlden v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv03129
Plaintiff:
Garrett Youlden
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Selke v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv03137
Plaintiff:
James E. Selke
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Russell v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv03135
Plaintiff:
Roy G Russell
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Dowdy v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv03134
Plaintiff:
William R Dowdy, Jr.
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Villareal v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv03136
Plaintiff:
Lawrence A Villareal
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Landry v. Indivior Inc. et al.
as 1:2024sf65693
Plaintiff:
Rachel Landry
Defendant:
Indivior Inc., Indivior PLC, Indivior Solutions, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Hardwick v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2024cv03121
Plaintiff:
Kevin D. Hardwick
Defendant:
3M Company, EIDP, INC. fka E.I. DU PONT DE NEMOURS AND COMPANY and The Chemours Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
Turner v. Mercedes-Benz USA LLC
as 3:2024cv00167
Plaintiff:
Renea Turner
Defendant:
Mercedes-Benz USA LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
