Cases 21 - 30 of 67
Xlear v. Focus Nutrition
as 17-4126
Plaintiff - Appellant:
XLEAR, a Utah corporation
Defendant - Appellee:
FOCUS NUTRITION, a Utah limited liability company
Arrow Electronics v. Arrow Partnership, et al
as 17-1062
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ARROW ELECTRONICS, INC.
Defendant - Appellee:
ARROW PARTNERSHIP, LLC and ARROW HOLDINGS, LLC
Bison Designs v. Lejon of California
as 16-1126
Plaintiff Counter Defendant - Appellant:
BISON DESIGNS, LLC
Defendant Counterclaimant - Appellee:
LEJON OF CALIFORNIA, INC.
Red Robin International v. Lehigh Valley Restaurant Group
as 16-1071
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RED ROBIN INTERNATIONAL, INC.
Defendant - Appellee:
LEHIGH VALLEY RESTAURANT GROUP, INC.
Cashland, et al v. Cashland, et al
as 16-6049
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CASHLAND INC., an Oklahoma corp, CASHLAND ONLINE LLC, an Oklahoma limited liability company and CASHLAND HOLDINGS LLC, an Oklahoma limited liability company
Defendant - Appellee:
CASHLAND INC., a Delaware corp, CASHLAND FINANCIAL SERVICES INC., a Delaware corp and CASH AMERICA INTERNATIONAL INC.
Yeager v. Fort Knox Security
as 15-4192
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GENERAL CHARLES E. "CHUCK" YEAGER, (Retired), an individual
Defendant - Appellee:
FORT KNOX SECURITY PRODUCTS, a Utah corporation
Earthgrains Baking Companies v. Sycamore, et al
as 15-4145
Plaintiff - Appellee:
EARTHGRAINS BAKING COMPANIES, INC.
Defendant - Appellant:
LELAND SYCAMORE
Defendant:
SYCAMORE FAMILY BAKERY, INC.
Forney Industries v. Daco of Missouri
as 15-1226
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FORNEY INDUSTRIES, INC., a Colorado Corporation
Defendant - Appellee:
DACO OF MISSOURI, INC., a Missouri corporation, DBA KDAR Compnay
Sprint Nextel Corporation v. The Middle Man, Inc.
as 15-3108
Plaintiff Counter Defendant - Appellee:
SPRINT NEXTEL CORPORATION
Defendant Counterclaimant - Appellant:
THE MIDDLE MAN, INC.
Defendant Counterclaimant:
BRIAN K. VASQUEZ
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
