Cases 1 - 10 of 3,638
Martin v. Tewalt
as 1:2024cv00241
Plaintiff:
Walter B. Martin
Defendant:
Josh Tewalt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Capone v. Tewalt
as 1:2024cv00236
Petitioner:
Charles Anthony Capone
Respondent:
Josh Tewalt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Williams v. Carlin
as 1:2024cv00216
Petitioner:
Kilby Dee Williams
Respondent:
Terema Carlin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wintrode v. Carter et al
as 1:2024cv00227
Petitioner:
Joshwa Aaron Wintrode
Respondent:
Tom Carter and Twin Falls County Adult Detention Facility
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wintrode v. Captain Hughes, et al.
as 1:2024cv00223
Plaintiff:
Joshwa Aaron Wintrode
Defendant:
Captain Hughes, Sgt. Ron Owen, Deputy Rebecca Coffman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bruck v. Ada County Sheriff's Office et al
as 1:2024cv00198
Plaintiff:
Scott C Bruck
Defendant:
Ada County Sheriff's Office, Greater Idaho Fugitive Task Force, Ada County Police Dept. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wintrode v. Moore et al
as 1:2024cv00197
Plaintiff:
Joshwa Aaron Wintrode
Defendant:
Anita M.E. Moore, Pierre Carnesi, Craig Cannon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ray v. F.B.O.P
as 1:2024cv00115
Petitioner:
Nathan E. Ray
Respondent:
F.B.O.P
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Quinones v. Davis et al
as 1:2024cv00121
Plaintiff:
Julian R. Quinones
Defendant:
Kelly D Davis, Jason Davis and Alliance Title Co.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Quinones v. Ponting, et al.
as 1:2024cv00108
Plaintiff:
Julian R. Quinones
Defendant:
Becky Ponting and Hanly Ponting
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
