Cases 1 - 6 of 6
TIKTOK INC. et al v. TRUMP et al
as 1:2020cv02658
Plaintiff:
TIKTOK INC. and BYTEDANCE LTD.
Not Classified By Court:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, DONALD J. TRUMP and WILBUR L. ROSS, JR.
Petitioner:
NETCHOICE, REPORTERS COMMITTEE FOR FREEDOM OF THE PRESS and JEFFREY A. LOVITKY
Defendant:
JOSEPH R. BIDEN, JR.
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706 Judicial Review of Agency Actions
FARM-TO-CONSUMER LEGAL DEFENSE FUND et al v. SCHAFER et al
as 1:2008cv01546
Plaintiff:
FARM-TO-CONSUMER LEGAL DEFENSE FUND, ROBERT ALEXANDER, JOE GOLIMBIESKI and others
Defendant:
ED SCHAFER and DON KOIVISTO
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
American Airlines, Inc. et al v. Federal Bureau of Investigations, et al
as 1:2007cv07051
Plaintiff:
American Airlines, Inc., AMR Corporation, UAL Corps. and others
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Investigation, Robert S. Mueller and United Airlines, Inc.
Amicu:
The Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701 Maritime Subsidy Board
American Airlines, Inc. et al v. Central Intelligence Agency et al
as 1:2007cv07050
Plaintiff:
American Airlines, Inc., AMR Corporation, United Airlines, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Central Intelligence Agency and Michael V. Hayden
Amicu:
The Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701 Maritime Subsidy Board
PETER B. v. CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY et al
as 1:2006cv01652
Plaintiff:
PETER B.
Defendant:
CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY, MARGARET PEGGY LYONS, DOES #1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
NATIONAL SECURITY ARCHIVE v. CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY et al
as 1:2006cv01080
Plaintiff:
NATIONAL SECURITY ARCHIVE
Defendant:
CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY, CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY, MICHAEL V. HAYDEN and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
