U.S. Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit Contract Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 791
Tru Mobility v. Briggs Auto Group
as 23-3089
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TRU MOBILITY, INC.
Defendant / Appellee:
BRIGGS AUTO GROUP, INC.
CLVM, et al v. Van Handel, et al
as 23-1154
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CLVM LLC, DBA Valimenta Labs and EMEK BLAIR
Defendant / Appellee:
ERIC VAN HANDEL and CHARLES BARKER
MVT Services v. Great West Casualty Company
as 23-2070
Plaintiff / Appellee:
MVT SERVICES, LLC, d/b/a MESILLA VALLEY TRANSPORTATION
Defendant / Appellant:
GREAT WEST CASUALTY COMPANY
Stone, et al v. Vail Resorts Development Company, et al
as 23-1147
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NELSON STONE and STONE FAMILY, LLC
Defendant / Appellee:
VAIL RESORTS DEVELOPMENT COMPANY and ARRABELLE AT VAIL SQUARE, LLC
Accelerated v. LMI II
as 23-6062
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ACCELERATED, LLC
Defendant / Appellee:
LMI II, LLC
Five Points Management Group v. Campaign, et al
as 23-1125
Plaintiff / Appellant:
FIVE POINTS MANAGEMENT GROUP, INC.
Defendant / Appellee:
CAMPAIGN, INC., a Delaware corporation and BRADLEY SEWELL, an individual
Fuel Automation v. Energera
as 23-1123
Plaintiff / Appellee:
FUEL AUTOMATION STATION, LLC
Defendant / Appellant:
ENERGERA INC
Behavioral Medicine Consulting, LLC, et al v. CHG Companies, Inc.
as 23-4047
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BEHAVIORAL MEDICINE CONSULTING, LLC, a Montana limited liability company and KEITH BROWN, M.D., an individual
Defendant / Appellee:
CHG COMPANIES, INC., a Delaware corporation, DBA CompHealth
Unitednet, et al v. Tata Communications America, et al
as 23-2057
Plaintiff / Appellant:
UNITEDNET LTD. and LEVI RUSSELL
Defendant / Appellee:
TATA COMMUNICATIONS AMERICA, INC., TATA COMMUNICATIONS INDIA, TATA SONS PRIVATE, LTD. and others
Chesapeake Operating v. C.C. Forbes
as 23-6052
Plaintiff / Appellee:
CHESAPEAKE OPERATING, LLC
Defendant / Appellant:
C.C. FORBES, LLC
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
