U.S. Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit Other Statutes Cases

Environmental Matters Cases, Dockets and Filings
Cases filed
Cases 91 - 100 of 164
Sierra Club, et al v. United States Forest Service, et al
as 12-4077
Plaintiff - Appellee: SIERRA CLUB, WILD UTAH PROJECT, WESTERN WILDLIFE CONSERVANCY and others
Defendant - Appellant: UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE, an agency of the United States, CHIP SIBBERNSEN, acting in his official capacity as District Ranger for the Ogden Ranger District, ROBBIN REDMAN, acting in his official capacity as District Ranger for the Ogden Ranger District and others
Colorado Environ. Coalition, et al v. Office of Legacy Management, et al
as 12-1168
Plaintiff - Appellee: COLORADO ENVIRONMENTAL COALITION, INFORMATION NETWORK FOR RESPONSIBLE MINING, CENTER FOR NATIVE ECOSYSTEMS and others
Defendant - Appellant: OFFICE OF LEGACY MANAGEMENT and UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Rocky Mountain Wild, et al v. Vilsack, et al
as 12-1133
Plaintiff - Appellee: ROCKY MOUNTAIN WILD, a Colorado non-profit corporation and WILDEARTH GUARDIANS, a New Mexico non-profit corporation
Defendant - Appellant: TOM VILSACK, in his official capacity as Secretary of Agriculture, ABIGAIL R. KIMBELL, in her official capacity as the Chief Forrester of the US Forest Service, TOM TIDWELL, in his official capacity as the Chief Forester of the U.S. Forest Service and others
Western Watersheds Project v. BLM We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 12-8012
Petitioner - Appellant: WESTERN WATERSHEDS PROJECT
Respondent - Appellee: BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT
Intervenor - Appellee: LHS SPLIT ROCK RANCH, LLC.
WildEarth Guardians, et al v. United States Forest Service, et al
as 12-1023
Plaintiff - Appellee: WILDEARTH GUARDIANS, a not-for-profit corporation
Defendant - Appellee: UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE, a federal agency within the U.S. Department of Agriculture, CHARLES S. RICHMOND, in his official capacity as Supervisor of the Grand Mesa, Uncompahgre, Gunnison National Forest, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, a federal agency and others
Intervenor - Appellant: MOUNTAIN COAL COMPANY L.L.C.
WildEarth v. United States Forest Service, et al
as 12-1005
Plaintiff - Appellant: WILDEARTH GUARDIANS, a not-for-profit corporation
Defendant - Appellee: UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE, a federal agency within the U.S. Department of Agriculture, CHARLES S. RICHMOND, in his official capacity as Supervisor of the Grand Mesa, Uncompahgre, Gunnison National Forest, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, a federal agency and others
WildEarth Guardians v. Public Service Company We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 11-1400
Plaintiff - Appellant: WILDEARTH GUARDIANS, a New Mexico non-profit corporation
Defendant - Appellee: PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF COLORADO, DBA Xcel Energy
Center for Native Ecosystems, et al v. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, et al
as 11-1377
Plaintiff - Appellee: CENTER FOR NATIVE ECOSYSTEMS, SOUTHERN UTAH WILDERNESS ALLIANCE, UTAH NATIVE PLANT SOCIETY and others
Defendant - Appellant: UNITED STATES FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE and KEN SALAZAR, in his official capacity as Secretary of the United States Department of the Interior
Hillside Environmental Loss, et al v. United States Army Corps, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 11-3210
Plaintiff - Appellant: HILLSIDE ENVIRONMENTAL LOSS PREVENTION, INC., KANSAS NATURAL RESOURCE COUNSEL, CHRIS AXE and others
Defendant - Appellee: UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, ROBERT L. VAN ANTWERP, Lieutenant General, in his official capacity, ROGER A. WISON, JR., Colonel, in his official capacity and others
Los Alamos Study Group v. US Department of Energy, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 11-2141
Plaintiff - Appellant: LOS ALAMOS STUDY GROUP
Defendant - Appellee: UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY, STEVEN CHU, in his capacity Secretary, Department of Energy, NATIONAL NUCLEAR SECURITY ADMINISTRATION and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?