U.S. Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit Labor Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 456
L.C., et al v. Blue Cross and Blue Shield
as 23-4028
Plaintiff / Appellant:
L.C. and F.C.
Defendant / Appellee:
BLUE CROSS AND BLUE SHIELD OF TEXAS
Ballou, et al v. United Parcel Service, Inc.
as 23-3021
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL BALLOU, HENRY MARTINEZ, MATTHEW SPINNATO and others
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC.
Nimeth v. UNUM Life Insurance Company of America, et al
as 22-1440
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KELLY L. NIMETH
Defendant / Appellee:
UNUM LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA, SONIC AUTOMOTIVE, INC. and SONIC-DENVER T, INC., DBA Mountain States Toyota
Martley v. City of Basehor, Kansas, et al
as 22-3263
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LLOYD MARTLEY
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF BASEHOR, KANSAS, DAVID BREUER and LESLEE RIVAROLA
Brent Electric Company v. International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers
as 22-5104
Appellant:
BRENT ELECTRIC COMPANY, INC.
Counter Claimant:
INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF ELECTRICAL WORKERS LOCAL NO. 584
Menocal, et al v. GEO Group
as 22-1409
Plaintiff / Appellee:
ALEJANDRO MENOCAL, MARCOS BRAMBILA, LOURDES ARGUETA and others
Defendant / Appellant:
THE GEO GROUP, INC.
Poletto v. Battaglino, et al
as 22-1382
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DOMINIC POLETTO
Defendant / Appellee:
TONY BATTAGLINO, NACL Step B Representative and NATIONAL ASSOCIATIONS OF LETTER CARRIERS, Branch 45, Denver Co, 80219
Holt v. Foot Locker Retail
as 22-3240
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DANIEL HOLT
Defendant / Appellee:
FOOT LOCKER RETAIL, INC.
Watson v. EMC Corp.
as 22-1356
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARIE WATSON
Defendant / Appellee:
EMC CORP.
Defendant:
ADP, LLC
M., et al v. United Behavioral Health, et al
as 22-4086
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANNE M., DAVID W. and E. W.-M.
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED BEHAVIORAL HEALTH and MOTION PICTURE INDUSTRY HEALTH PLAN FOR ACTIVE PARTICIPANTS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
