Tenth Circuit Contract Cases
Cases 71 - 80 of 229
RE/MAX LLC v. RE/MAX Fidelity, Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv02159
Plaintiff:
RE/MAX LLC
Defendant:
RE/MAX Fidelity, Inc. and Michael Kebriaei
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051
Homewatch International, Inc. v. Navin
as 1:2016cv02143
Plaintiff:
Homewatch International, Inc.
Defendant:
Suzanne Navin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Express Services Inc v. Aspen Staffing Services LLC
as 5:2016cv00976
Plaintiff:
Express Services Inc
Defendant:
Aspen Staffing Services LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Vasquez v. La Quinta Inns & Suites
as 1:2016cv01772
Plaintiff:
Vincent Vasquez
Defendant:
La Quinta Inns & Suites
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sonic Industries LLC et al v. Halleran et al
as 5:2016cv00709
Plaintiff:
Sonic Industries LLC , Sonic Franchising LLC and Sonic Industries Services Inc
Defendant:
Arthur J Halleran, Jr, OKS Campbell LLC, OKS Commercial & U LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Grease Monkey International, Inc. v. Barzo, S.A. de C.V. et al
as 1:2016cv00655
Plaintiff:
Grease Monkey International, Inc.
Defendant:
Barzo, S.A. de C.V. and Arturo Rodriguez Hernandez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Express Services Inc v. Barr Dan Inc
as 5:2016cv00229
Plaintiff:
Express Services Inc
Defendant:
Barr Dan Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Steak N Shake Enterprises, et al v. Globex Company, et al
as 16-1010
Plaintiff - Appellee:
STEAK N SHAKE ENTERPRISES, INC. and STEAK N SHAKE LLC
Defendant - Appellant:
GLOBEX COMPANY, LLC, SPRINGFIELD DOWNS LLC, CHRISTOPHER BAERNS and others
Armstrong v. Volkswagen Group of America
as 1:2016cv00071
Plaintiff:
Raymond H. Armstrong
Defendant:
Volkswagen Group of America
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2310
Pak Mail Centers of America, Inc. v. Robinson et al
as 1:2016cv00029
Plaintiff:
Pak Mail Centers of America, Inc.
Defendant:
William Robinson and Gayle Abramson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
