Tenth Circuit Federal Tax Suits Cases
Cases filed
Cases 1 - 10 of 1,253
Hinkle et al v. United States of America
as 1:2016cv01052
Plaintiff:
Gene E. Hinkle , Betty L. Hinkle
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: IRS: Refund Taxes
Hinkle v. United States of America
as 1:2016cv01051
Plaintiff:
William D. Hinkle
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: IRS: Refund Taxes
Hinkle et al v. United States of America
as 1:2016cv01048
Plaintiff:
R. Bryan Hinkle , Matilda Garcia
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: IRS: Refund Taxes
USA v. Madsen et al
as 2:2016cv00946
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
Douglas R. Madsen, Andrea C. Madsen, Grand Scale Inc.
and others
Cause Of Action: IRS: Tax Liability
United States of America v. Figart et al
as 4:2016cv00587
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Jan L Figart, Michael D Figart, Sr, Michael D Figart, Jr
Cause Of Action: Suit to Enforce Federal Tax Lien
United States of America, et al. v. Rael
as 1:2016mc00039
Petitioner:
United States of America , Internal Revenue Service
Respondent:
Salomon L Rael
Cause Of Action: IRS: Petition to Enforce IRS Summons
Kauffman v. United States of America
as 1:2016cv00922
Plaintiff:
Stuart A Kauffman
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: IRS: Refund Excise Tax
Belcher v. United State
as 16-8084
Plaintiff Counter Defendant - Appellee:
TONI J. BELCHER
Defendant Counterclaimant Third-Party Plaintiff - Appellant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Third-Party Defendant:
STEVEN J. FERNANDEZ
USA v. Hoggan et al
as 2:2016cv00863
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
Kent A. Hoggan, Diane H. Hoggan, Rusty Dusty LLC
and others
Cause Of Action: IRS: Tax Liability
United States v. Hodges, et al
as 16-6229
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
REX A. HODGES, LISA A. HODGES, BANK OF AMERICA MORTGAGE
and others
Defendant:
MIDLAND FUNDING, LLC
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.