US District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma Other Statutes Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 31
Cyprus Amax Minerals Company v. TCI Pacific Communications, Inc. et al
as 4:2011cv00252
Plaintiff:
Cyprus Amax Minerals Company
Defendant:
TCI Pacific Communications, Inc. , Viacom, Inc. , CBS Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 9607
United States of America v. Magellan Pipeline Company, L.P.
as 4:2010cv00028
Plaintiff:
United States of America, United States of America, United States of America and others
Defendant:
Magellan Pipeline Company, L.P.
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1319 Clean Water Act
Oklahoma Department of Environmental Quality v. Cyprus Amax Minerals Company
as 4:2009cv00326
Plaintiff:
Oklahoma Department of Environmental Quality
Defendant:
Cyprus Amax Minerals Company
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 6901 Environmental Cleanup Expenses
LaFarge Building Materials, Inc. v. Rogers County Board of County Commissioners
as 4:2009cv00242
Plaintiff:
LaFarge Building Materials, Inc.
Defendant:
Rogers County Board of County Commissioners
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 6901 Resource & Recovery Act
Byford v. Johnson et al
as 4:2008cv00057
Plaintiff:
Leo Byford
Defendant:
Stephen L Johnson, Richard Greene, Sam Coleman and others
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1365 Environmental Matters
Tyson Foods, Inc. et al v. Tahlequah, City of et al
as 4:2006cv00502
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 9607 Real Property Tort to Land
Cargill Turkey Production, LLC v. Tahlequah, City of et al
as 4:2006cv00503
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 9607 Real Property Tort to Land
Jay, City of v. R.J. Transportation, Inc. et al
as 4:2005cv00668
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 6901 Environmental Cleanup Expenses
Attorney General of the State of Oklahoma et al v. Tyson Foods, Inc. et al
as 4:2005cv00329
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 9607 Real Property Tort to Land
Crockett, et al v. Gold Fields Mining, et al
as 4:2004cv00804
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
