Eleventh Circuit Other Statutes Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 47
Jennings v. Astrue
as 2:2009cv00211
Plaintiff:
James Henry Jennings
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Type:
Other Statutes
Bradford v. Astrue
as 1:2009cv03195
Plaintiff:
Nancy Bradford
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Type:
Other Statutes
Jennings v. Astrue
as 2:2009mi00027
Plaintiff:
James Henry Jennings
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Type:
Other Statutes
Hicks v. Astrue
as 1:2009cv03156
Plaintiff:
Tony Hicks
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Type:
Other Statutes
Derrico v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2009cv03138
Plaintiff:
Eldrico Derrico
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Type:
Other Statutes
Peters v. Astrue
as 1:2009mi00470
Plaintiff:
Gwendolyn Peters
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Type:
Other Statutes
Derrico v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2009mi00456
Plaintiff:
Eldrico Derrico
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Type:
Other Statutes
Edwards v. Astrue
as 1:2009mi00455
Plaintiff:
Qualithian Edwards
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Type:
Other Statutes
Adamson v. Astrue
as 1:2009cv02902
Plaintiff:
Gregory Adamson
Defendant:
Michael Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Type:
Other Statutes
Phillips v. Astrue
as 1:2009cv02901
Plaintiff:
Barbara A. Phillips and Barbara A. Phillips
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Type:
Other Statutes
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.