Eleventh Circuit Labor Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 3,009
Hill et al v. Kemper Corporation
as 6:2024cv00541
Plaintiff:
Ashley Hill and Anali De Jesus
Defendant:
Kemper Corporation
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2102 Notice Required Before Plant Closings and Mass Layoffs
GASKIN v. HEALTHTRUST WORKFORCE SOLUTIONS
as 0:2024cv60431
Plaintiff:
YOLANDA GASKIN
Defendant:
HEALTHTRUST WORKFORCE SOLUTIONS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act
Kirby v. Waffle House #740
as 5:2024cv00347
Plaintiff:
Pamela Kirby
Defendant:
Waffle House #740
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
MERE v. DISYS SOLUTIONS, INC.
as 1:2024cv21032
Plaintiff:
NERLENE MERE
Defendant:
DISYS SOLUTIONS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0451 Employment Discrimination
Karichkowsky v. Crafty Crab St Pete Inc. et al
as 8:2024cv00676
Plaintiff:
JASON KARICHKOWSKY
Defendant:
CRAFTY CRAB ST PETE INC and MING LIN ZHANG
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Ible v. Maplebear Inc.,
as 0:2024cv60406
Defendant:
Maplebear Inc., and Instacart
Plaintiff:
Ishanna Ible
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Threatt v. Trident Building Systems, LLC
as 8:2024cv00670
Plaintiff:
William Threatt
Defendant:
Trident Building Systems, LLC
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0704 Labor Litigation
Kelvin Stephens v. Homewood Suites
as 24-10755
Plaintiff:
KELVIN B. STEPHENS
Defendant:
HOMEWOOD SUITES
Argro v. Geico General Insurance Company
as 6:2024cv00499
Plaintiff:
Lora Argro
Defendant:
Geico General Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
GOODSON v. LOVE MANAGEMENT COMPANY LLC
as 4:2024cv00117
Plaintiff:
Mickey Goodson
Defendant:
Love Management Company, LLC d/b/a Allegro Senior Living and LOVE MANAGEMENT COMPANY LLC doing business as ALLEGRO SENIOR LIVING LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
